Ok I was trying to remember what the horcruxes were:
The locket
Teh Cup . . .?
The Ring



Then I think Harry's scar is a horcrux

I think the journal in the second book was also one.

I think that we are introduced to a new one every book... Help me out if I missed them.... I think that maybe Harry is Horcrux... That way,when Harry kills the part of Voldemort, he will also die because of the prophecy.

First Book: Voldemort himself
Second Book: Diary
Third Book:???
Fourth Book: Nagini
Fifth Book: The Locket @ Grimmauld Place
Sixth Book: Ring
Seventh Book:???

THE LOCKET
THE CUP
THE RING
THE SNAKE
THE DIARY
SOMETHING OF GRYFFINDOR'S OR RAVENCLAW'S.

thats the six horcruxes that have been said in the books. Harry's scar in my view can't be a horcrux, because why would Voldemort try to kill his horcrux if he made Harry one?

Because of the prophecy... What a perfect Horcrux though, because of Lily, very few people could hurt Harry, Voldemort did not want his Horcruxes to be destroyed.
Didn't Dumbledore say that the only things that he knew about that were Griffindors were the sorting hat and the sword?

Me and tim both disagree where the sorting hat is concerned, he says its gryffindors. The actal material IS but the actual SORTING hat is belonging to the four founders. JK actually told us it wasnt the hat in an interview she said:

"As if...why would a secret horcrux want to sit at the front of a school and start singing!"

Which leaves the sword however in the COS the sword is used AGAINST voldemort so that rules that out.

Voldemort would not kill a horcrux he just made. whats the point? the body decomposes and, oh look, no horcrux, it gone, and hes shreadded his soul for nothing.

Coz there are seven horcruxes, and in attempt to make his final horcrux things went wrong, that being with Harry, so by mistake Harry became a horcrux, hence his powers, parseltongue and such. Yet i believe when voldie dies harry's scar will disappear

Harry is not a horcrux. If he were Voldemort wouldnt be wanting to kill him for all those years. It makes no sense. I personally think that we havent been introduced to the two more horcruxes.

Making a Horcrux is not an easy thing and perhaps, Voldemort may have made a mistake. What if Harry is a Horcrux and Voldemort wants to make him a stronger Horcrux... (There are stronger and weaker Horcruxes... We see this because Dumbledore burns his arm off trying to destroy the ring, yet Harry can stab a book and that Horcrux is destroyed) Killing someone who is a weak Horcrux and making a new Horcrux from that killing must be a stronger one... If that makes any sense...

Truthfully when Voldemort killed Harry's parents I think he only had five horcruxes because he wanted to use Harry's death to make the sixth. Of course he could've gotten a sixth one some other way.

I guess nobody really knows for sure... we will have to wait until next summer I guess...

I CAN'T WAIT THAT LONG *dies* aaaaaaaah well

I'm reading all the books over again while I wait...

*sigh* in the time of emergancy I believe voldemort used his snake nagini as the 7th and final horcrux. We only have one horcrux we need to guess at, like tim said we know sixx of them:

THE LOCKET
THE CUP
THE RING
THE SNAKE
THE DIARY
SOMETHING OF GRYFFINDOR'S OR RAVENCLAW'S


and of course the last horcrux being voldemort himself.

Yeah, HArshings right, AND HARRY IS NOT THE HORCRUX BECAUSE AVADA KEDAVRA IS NOT THE HORCRUX CHARM

We don't know that much about AK. I would imagine that there are a few variations of it, one being a little known one which creates Horcruxs.

Zaurus is part correct. AK kills. end of, but you need an exta charm afterwards to create the horcrux. AK is just the starting point, to rip your soul. then you have to put it into another object. now, just think about it. Harry's scar. have we ever known any other horcrux to look damaged? Answer: nope

A scar means something has healed not that something is damaged. Also, scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue. Also, Harry and Tom Riddle are the only people known to have survived being AKed. wouldn't Voldemort want to use someone as strong as he is as a horcrux?

and to heal it has to be damaged, or there would be no scar. and as i said, has any horcrux been damaged? no

read the modified post

no, not really, because Harry's stregnth lasts until he is 17, when he is an adult. someone could quite easily, on his 17th birthday, go out and murder Harry (wont happen, but in theory) because his protection from his bloodline will fail. therefore, Voldemort can get at least 17 years worth of life, before Harry can be killed, and Voldemort has lived that easily using his other horcruxes.

and there is still the problem that VOLDEMORT IS TRYING TO MURDER HARRY! he's the prime target, why would he want him dead if he was the horcrux? there is no logic behind that.

What about the Prophecy? Harry knows about the prophecy and therefore is a danger to Voldemort.

The prophecy has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

Harry was a danger to Voldemort ever since he was born, and Harry found out the prophecy existed 14 years after the first attack which killed Lily and James. it has no relevence to whether Harry is dangerous really, other than it gave Voldemort the spark to attack and give Harry his 'incredible powers'. it doesnt have any use for Horcruxes